The proletariat’s paradox

Proletariat can be defined as the working class or the segment of society that chooses to work for someone else in order to survive. There are different kinds of proletariat. In fact, they come from different types, shapes and forms. For simplicity sake, I will define them as high, middle and low.

High proletariat are higher level employees in a particular organization. They hold the fate of many middle and lower level proletariats in their organization. Lower proletariat are employees who belong to the low levels of the organization hierarchy and are often seen as a commodity by proletariat at the top. Proletariat in the middle are simply defined as middle level proletariat. Their DNA contains elements of both high and low level proletariat.

Every organization has them. For better or for worse. This is interesting.

Seth Godin once said that kings profit and stay in power by making peons work harder, limiting their growth for self gain and for maintaining the status who. Peons, on the other hand, hold the belief that hard work is their ticket to one day have the chance to becoming the king.

If Seth is right, then we have a proletariat paradox, assuming that the king represents high proletariat and peons lower proletariat. I tend to agree with him.

Where do you fall in the proletariat paradox? Can you escape the inevitable? Only time will tell.

 

 

 

 

Advertisements